MANILA, Philippines — The Home of Representatives on Sunday criticized Vice President Sara Duterte for planning to skip the November 20 listening to on confidential funds earlier than the Home Blue Ribbon Committee.
On Friday, Duterte introduced that she wouldn’t attend the investigation into the alleged misuse of funds allotted to the Workplace of the Vice President (OVP) and the Division of Schooling (DepEd), which she beforehand headed.
As an alternative, she said that she would reply to the findings by way of a written affidavit.
“I gained’t attend the subsequent hearings. I already went there… however we plan to ship a letter [and] we plan to say why. After which, I plan as properly to submit an affidavit in regards to the confidential funds because the affidavit [is done] below oath,” Duterte advised reporters on Friday.
READ: VP Duterte declines invite to Home listening to
Article continues after this commercial
Home Assistant Majority Chief and Zambales Rep. Jay Khongkun described Duterte’s transfer as a “deliberate evasion of accountability.”
Article continues after this commercial
“Walang masama sa affidavit. Pero ang problema ay ’yung budol fashion niya—sinasabing hindi siya inimbitahan, pero ngayong might pagkakataon siyang linawin ang isyu, ayaw niyang humarap. Kung walang itinatago, bakit hindi kayang sagutin nang harapan ang tanong ng Kongreso at ng taumbayan?” Khonghun expressed in an announcement on Sunday.
(There’s nothing flawed with the affidavit. However the issue is along with her deceitful method—claiming that she wasn’t invited, however now that she has the possibility to make clear the difficulty, she refuses to face it. If there’s nothing to cover, why can’t she reply the questions of Congress and the general public instantly?)
The identical sentiment was echoed by Home Deputy Majority Chief and La Union Rep. Paolo Ortega V, saying that the affidavit submission was merely a “tactic to keep away from scrutiny.”
“Isang pambubudol na naman ito sa ngalan ng panawagang sumagot si VP Sara dahil gagamitin ang affidavit para makatakas at hindi na mag-appear sa listening to. Hindi ito sapat para linawin ang mga isyu ng confidential funds. Harapin niya ang mga tanong ng publiko at ng Kongreso,” Ortega stated on Sunday.
(That is one other type of deceit below the guise of a name for VP Sara to reply, utilizing the affidavit as an excuse to flee and keep away from showing on the listening to. This isn’t sufficient to make clear the problems surrounding the confidential funds. She ought to face the questions of the general public and Congress.)
The Home leaders additional famous that Duterte attended the preliminary listening to on Wednesday, September 18 however declined to take an oath as a useful resource individual, refused to reply questions from lawmakers, and left the session early after delivering a quick assertion criticizing the investigation.
“She has since skipped subsequent hearings, citing constitutional considerations and questioning the investigation’s necessity,” they added.
In accordance with Khongkun, the committee has prolonged ample alternatives for Duterte to elucidate the utilization of public funds allotted to her workplace.
In actual fact, the November 20 listening to invitation was personally handed to Duterte throughout a Home quad committee listening to on Wednesday, November 13, which was attended by her father, former President Rodrigo Duterte.
“Ang tanong ng taongbayan: Nasaan ang malinaw na paliwanag?” Khonghun questioned.
(Now, the individuals have questioned: The place is the clear clarification?)
Moreso, Ortega cautioned that the vp’s continued absence from the probe might additional intensify public doubt.
“Kung magpapatuloy ang pag-iwas, lalong magdududa ang publiko. Huwag natin hayaan ang mga ‘budol’ techniques na maghari,” the lawmaker stated.
(If this avoidance continues, the general public will solely grow to be extra suspicious. Let’s not enable these ‘rip-off’ techniques to prevail.)
Khonghun appealed to Duterte to rethink her choice, emphasizing the essential position of transparency in sustaining public belief.
“As public servants, our obligation is to the individuals. Vice President Duterte owes it to the Filipino individuals to offer solutions—not simply on paper, however in individual,” the Home chief confused.