Two feminine highschool athletes from California, Ok.S. and T.S., together with their households, and the Save Women’ Sports activities affiliation, have filed an amended federal lawsuit towards the State of California, Riverside Unified Faculty District, and faculty officers.
The lawsuit challenges AB 1266, the California legislation that “requires colleges to permit organic males to compete in women’ sports activities and use feminine bogs,” in line with the plaintiffs.
“This legislation conflicts with federal Title IX protections, which had been established to make sure equity, security, and equal alternatives for feminine college students and athletes.
AB 1266 undermines feminine athletes, forcing them to compete towards organic males who maintain simple bodily benefits. This isn’t equality,” in line with Advocates for Religion & Freedom, a non-profit legislation agency devoted to defending constitutional and non secular liberty within the courts
“Because of AB 1266 and the college district’s discriminatory practices, college officers eliminated T.S. from the ladies’ varsity cross-country staff and changed her with a organic male who had beforehand damaged feminine cross-country information at one other highschool. In an effort to talk out towards this unfair remedy, T.S. and Ok.S. wore shirts displaying the message ‘Save Women’ Sports activities’ and ‘It’s Widespread Sense. XX ≠ XY.’ Nonetheless, college officers then ordered them to take away or cowl the messages, labeling the shirts as ‘hostile’ and evaluating the shirts to swastikas.”
The lawsuit names California Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond and Legal professional Basic Rob Bonta “for implementing AB 1266, together with Riverside Unified Faculty District officers Principal Leann Iacuone and Assistant Principal Amanda Chann, who discriminated towards Ok.S., T.S., and members of the Save Women’ Sports activities Affiliation.
Since submitting the lawsuit, greater than 200 college students have worn the ‘Save Women’ Sports activities’ shirts on campus in solidarity with Ok.S. and T.S., sending a transparent message to high school directors and State officers that discrimination towards feminine athletes won’t be tolerated.”
Advocates legal professional Julianne Fleischer said, “The federal government is steamrolling over girls’s rights with radical insurance policies that dismantle equity in sports activities and muzzle those that dare to defend it. This isn’t progress; it’s regression. Feminine athletes practice, sacrifice, and compete to win—to not be sidelined by an ideology that ignores organic actuality.”
Legal professional Robert Tyler added, “Title IX was created to guard feminine athletes from precisely this sort of injustice. The concept organic males ought to take spots from younger girls is an outright betrayal of the legislation’s intent. We applaud President Trump for taking decisive motion to revive equity and demand that California abandon this harmful agenda earlier than it erases a era of feminine athletes.”
“The plaintiffs search a federal ruling that AB 1266 violates Title IX in addition to a choice holding the District accountable for violating their First Modification rights. They demand injunctive aid to cease colleges from forcing organic women to compete with and towards males, a judgment affirming sex-based protections in athletics, and compensation for damages brought on by these discriminatory insurance policies.”
