One of many largest tales in ladies’s basketball this previous yr was Caitlin Clark’s omission from the U.S. Olympic basketball workforce. Clark — amid an up-and-down starting to her rookie season on the Indiana Fever — was left off the 12-woman roster, a choice that immediately grew to become a nationwide controversy.
Critics railed USA Basketball for protecting her off the workforce, citing her rising recognition as cause why she ought to have been on the Paris Olympics roster.
Relatively than Clark, the roster included guards with extra veteran guards like Jewell Loyd, Kelsey Plum, Jackie Younger, Chelsea Grey, Diana Taurasi, Sabrina Ionescu, and Kahleah Copper. Every of these guys had been multiple-time All-Stars — some even multiple-time Olympians. At 26 years outdated, Ionescu marked the youngest participant on the roster.
In a Time interview with Sean Gregory, Clark admitted her preliminary disappointment from being left off the USA basketball roster — however made clear she rejected the notion she ought to have been named to the workforce as a consequence of her recognition.
When the rosters had been finalized, the Fever boasted a 3-9 file, and Clark was within the midst of an inconsistent begin to the season, a stretch that was marred by a number of high-turnover video games and spotty taking pictures performances.
“I gave them loads of causes to maintain me off the workforce with my play,” she mentioned.
She additionally acknowledged the depth of expertise on the USA Basketball roster.
“A degree all people was making was like, ‘Who’re you taking off the workforce?’” Clark mentioned. “And that was an amazing level.”
Many media personalities insisted that leaving Clark off the roster was a mistake as a consequence of advertising and marketing cause — pointing to the visibility and a focus she would inveitably carry along with her to Paris.
ESPN’s Stephen A Smith and USA At the moment’s Christine Brennan had been two of the loudest voices that admonished USA Basketball for not placing Clark on the roster from a visibility standpoint — not as a result of the workforce was lacking her skillset.
Why leaving Caitlin Clark off the 2024 US Olympic ladies’s basketball workforce issues, so much. I’ve reported on the workforce at each Olympics since 1984. I’ve watched the beautiful lack of protection & lack of curiosity each time. Listed below are 4 sections of my Feb column on this actual subject: pic.twitter.com/MjwqeVQdR8
— Christine Brennan (@cbrennansports) June 8, 2024
“Now, you got here dwelling with the gold. You dealt with your online business,” mentioned Stephen A Smith of the USA Basketball ladies’s workforce. “However while you speak about advertising and marketing the game, I feel Group USA missed a chance to raise the profile of ladies’s excellence within the sport of basketball.”
Clark rejected the notion that she ought to have been on the roster as a consequence of her particular person recognition.
“I don’t wish to be there as a result of I’m someone that may carry consideration,” Clark mentioned. “I like that for the sport of ladies’s basketball. However on the identical time, I wish to be there as a result of they suppose I’m adequate. I don’t wish to be some little particular person that’s sort of dragged round for folks to cheer about and solely watch as a result of I’m sitting on the bench.”
In actuality, Clark’s play in her rookie season in the end demonstrated that she ought to have been on the workforce as a consequence of her basketball prowess. After the Olympic break, she tremendously improved her play, in the end establishing herself as top-of-the-line guards within the league, if not the finest — and finally being named to the All-WNBA First Group.
Clark averaged 23.4 factors and eight.9 assists after the break, and the Fever punched their ticket to the WNBA playoffs for the primary time since 2017. She recorded extra assists in a single WNBA season than any participant in WNBA historical past.
Jen Rizzotti, USA Basketball’s choice committee chair, vehemently disagreed that gamers’ recognition ought to have been a consideration.
”It might be irresponsible for us to speak about her in a means aside from how she would influence the play of the workforce,” Rizzotti mentioned. “As a result of it wasn’t the purview of our committee to determine how many individuals would watch or how many individuals would root for the U.S. It was our purview to create the perfect workforce we might for Cheryl.”
Clark’s improved post-Olympic play demonstrated she virtually actually would have been match on the roster, particularly contemplating the struggles of a number of the USA workforce’s older gamers all through the event.
Clark famous that being left off the roster “will certainly encourage me my total profession.”
Barring an harm, the WNBA sensation is practicaly a shoe-in for the 2028 roster, one thing she instructed Gregory was a “an enormous, big aim.”
However, the discourse round her exclusion by no means ought to have been centered round her recognition — or the possible viewership increase that may have come along with her inclusion.
“That entire narrative sort of upset me,” Clark mentioned. “As a result of that isn’t honest. It’s disrespectful to the people who had been on the workforce, that had earned it and had been actually good. And it’s additionally disrespectful to myself.”